![]() |
| Home | Latest Newsletter | |||||||
BCLR/MJS Step Ahead Newsletter No. 1/2008 Mere suspicion by SARS does not suffice to prove fraud by a taxpayer Misdescription of insured property - rejection of insurance claim Beware penalty clauses in contracts
Employment Opportunities for Candidate Attorneys
|
||||||||
From the judge's mouthRemoval of jacket but not trousers"Advocate Michael Gillespie (now Mr Justice Gillespie, who is making a notable contribution to our law), was appearing before Mr Justice Samatta, a Tanzanian judge, who for a few years in 1980's, served on the bench here. Gillespie had to ask for permission for a witness to be allowed to give evidence without wearing a jacket. He did so along the following lines: ' My lord, the witness was out during the luncheon adjournment and was caught in an unexpected rainstorm and his jacket is soaked and unpresentable. Might I crave the indulgence of the court and ask whether he might give his evidence in his shirt sleeves ?I should add, my lord, that I myself was caught in the same downpour and my trousers got wet, but I seek no further indulgence from your lordship. ' " * * From a letter of 3 June 1998 by Mr John Reid Rowland, registered legal practitioner, Zimbabwe to Ellison Kahn, published in "Law Life and Laughter Encore", Ellison Kahn, Juta & Co, 1999.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||